GMC

Global Methodist Church Resource Center

The Global Methodist Church Resource Center provides information, education, and advocacy resources for individuals navigating the administrative and judicial processes of the Global Methodist Church.

Associates in Advocacy is committed to helping the Church fulfill its own intentions to be just. We seek to assist clergy, laity, advocates, complainants, respondents, conference superintendents, presiding elders, church officers, and others in understanding the provisions of the Global Methodist Church’s Book of Doctrines and Discipline and the principles of fair process that govern church proceedings.

This resource center will provide access to educational materials, procedural guides, church-law references, and resources for those involved in administrative and judicial matters. Particular attention will be given to the distinctive structures and procedures of the Global Methodist Church, including administrative complaints, supervisory responsibilities, judicial administration, and the Connectional Council on Appeals. Resources will also reflect applicable legislation adopted by the denomination’s General Conferences.

Our goal is to promote informed participation, accountability, reconciliation where possible, and justice always. We recognize that faithful administration of church law is not simply a matter of following procedures, but an expression of our shared covenant to live together as disciples of Jesus Christ.

Book of Doctrines and Discipline

The Book of Doctrines and Discipline of the Global Methodist Church establishes the denomination’s doctrinal foundations, constitution, organizational structure, and provisions governing the life and ministry of the Church. It provides the framework for the responsibilities of clergy and laity, the authority of church bodies, and the administrative and judicial procedures through which the Church maintains accountability and seeks justice.

The Book of Doctrines and Discipline adopted at the 2024 Convening General Conference in Costa Rica established an important foundation for the denomination’s continuing life and governance. Its provisions reflect the Global Methodist Church’s commitment to scriptural holiness, connectional accountability, and a form of church government intended to support the mission of making disciples of Jesus Christ. Understanding these provisions is essential for advocates, clergy, conference leaders, and others participating in administrative or judicial proceedings.

The 2026 General Conference in Johannesburg adopted additional legislation affecting the doctrine, governance, and procedures of the Global Methodist Church. As the denomination incorporates these actions into its official disciplinary publications, AIA will seek to provide accurate references, identify significant changes, and assist individuals in understanding how those changes affect church administration, fair process, and judicial proceedings. Particular attention will be given to the disciplinary provisions applicable at the time of the actions or proceedings being examined.

Administrative Processes

The Global Methodist Church establishes administrative processes to address concerns involving clergy effectiveness, ministerial responsibilities, and the faithful performance of pastoral duties. These processes are intended to provide accountability while protecting the rights of clergy and the integrity of the Church. The Book of Doctrines and Discipline establishes specific procedures for administrative complaints, including supervisory responses, administrative review, and applicable fair process protections.

Paragraph 906 of the 2024 Book of Doctrines and Discipline defines administrative complaints as allegations of unsatisfactory ministerial performance involving incompetence, ineffectiveness, unwillingness, or inability to fulfill ministerial duties. Such complaints are distinct from allegations of professional or personal misconduct, which must be addressed through the judicial provisions of Paragraph 908. This distinction is fundamental to determining the appropriate procedures, the authority of church officials and committees, and the rights of those involved.

Associates in Advocacy seeks to help clergy, advocates, presiding elders, conference superintendents, bishops, and others understand these administrative procedures and their proper application. Particular attention is given to the responsibilities of supervisory officials, the independent role of the Administrative Review Committee, and the fair process protections established by Paragraph 905. Administrative proceedings should be conducted with transparency, accountability, and respect for the rights of all participants. AIA encourages faithful adherence to church law while seeking reconciliation, restoration, and justice.

Administrative Complaints Concerning Clergy

Paragraph 906 of the Global Methodist Church’s 2024 Book of Doctrines and Discipline establishes procedures for administrative complaints concerning clergy. Such complaints involve allegations that a clergy member has demonstrated incompetence, ineffectiveness, unwillingness, or inability to perform ministerial duties. Administrative complaints may be submitted by laypersons within the scope of the clergy member’s ministry, other clergy familiar with that ministry, the presiding elder, the conference superintendent, or the bishop. Complaints must include specific examples of unsatisfactory performance, with approximate dates and times when appropriate.

A fundamental distinction exists between administrative complaints and allegations of professional or personal misconduct. Paragraph 906 specifically directs that misconduct allegations be addressed through the judicial provisions of Paragraph 908 rather than through an administrative complaint. Properly identifying the nature of a complaint is essential to determining which procedures apply, which church bodies possess authority, and what protections must be provided. AIA emphasizes that allegations must be evaluated according to their substance rather than simply the terminology used by the complainant or the official receiving the complaint.

The administrative process established by Paragraph 906 is governed by the applicable Judicial Practices and Procedures (JPP). It begins with an administrative supervisory response and, when warranted, may proceed through investigation, administrative review, and appeal. Each annual conference is required to establish an Administrative Review Committee whose responsibility is to ensure that the prescribed procedures and fair process protections have been properly followed. AIA encourages careful attention to the responsibilities of each participating body, the rights of complainants and respondents, and the distinction between determining ministerial effectiveness and adjudicating allegations of misconduct. Faithful adherence to these requirements is essential to accountability, reconciliation, restoration, and justice.

Administrative Supervisory Response

The administrative supervisory response is the first stage in addressing an administrative complaint concerning clergy in the Global Methodist Church. Under Paragraph 906 of the Book of Doctrines and Discipline and Section 2.1 of the Judicial Practices and Procedures (JPP), this response involves a meeting of the complainant, the respondent, and the bishop or presiding elder. Both the complainant and respondent are entitled to have a support person present who has the right to speak during the meeting. Participants must receive at least twenty days’ notice of the scheduled meeting, and the provisions governing the written complaint must be observed.

The purpose of the supervisory response is to establish the relevant facts, consider the circumstances and explanations offered by the parties, determine whether concerns about ministerial performance warrant action, and seek an appropriate resolution. The process provides three possible outcomes. First, the conference superintendent may dismiss the complaint, with the agreement of a majority of the presiding elders, when it has no basis in church law or fact. Second, the parties may reach an agreed resolution that is signed and placed in the respondent’s personnel file. Third, when no resolution is reached and the conference superintendent determines that the allegations have a factual basis warranting further action, the complaint is forwarded to the chairperson of the board of ministry for investigation.

The JPP requires the administrative supervisory response to be completed within sixty days after the conference superintendent receives the complaint. One additional thirty-day extension may be granted when both the complainant and respondent agree. AIA emphasizes that these time requirements, the right to appropriate representation, the careful examination of allegations, and the proper documentation of decisions are essential safeguards. The supervisory response should not be treated as a predetermined judgment against the clergy member, but as an opportunity to establish facts, seek accountability, and pursue reconciliation and restoration where possible while maintaining a commitment to justice.

Administrative Investigation and Review

When an administrative complaint cannot be resolved through the supervisory response and is referred for further consideration, the Judicial Practices and Procedures (JPP 2.2) establish an investigative process conducted by a committee of at least five members of the Board of Ministry. The committee is responsible for examining the allegations, gathering relevant information, interviewing witnesses, and determining whether the concerns about ministerial performance have sufficient factual basis to warrant action. Both the complainant and respondent, together with their support persons, are entitled to participate in the investigative hearing and exercise the procedural rights established by church law.

The investigative committee must conduct a closed hearing at which evidence is presented and the respondent has an opportunity to respond, question witnesses, and present relevant information. Under the 2024 procedures, the investigation and hearing must be completed within sixty days of referral, with one possible thirty-day extension agreed upon by both parties. The committee may dismiss allegations that lack sufficient basis, require remedial measures when allegations are substantiated, or recommend an involuntary change in conference status. Recommendations involving involuntary status changes require heightened voting thresholds and further approval by the appropriate church bodies. Written decisions and supporting records must be maintained according to the Discipline.

The Administrative Review Committee performs a separate and essential responsibility. Under Paragraph 710.7 and JPP 2.3, this committee examines whether the investigative procedures and the principles of fair process established by Paragraph 905 have been properly followed. It does not determine the merits of the allegations or substitute its judgment for that of the investigative committee. Instead, it evaluates procedural compliance, identifies errors, and may recommend appropriate corrective action. Its report must be completed within thirty days of receiving the matter and provided to the designated parties and church bodies before further action. AIA emphasizes that the independence of administrative review and faithful compliance with established procedures are essential safeguards for both individual clergy and the Church.

Administrative Fair Process — Paragraph 905

Paragraph 905 of the Global Methodist Church’s Book of Doctrines and Discipline establishes the Principles of Fair Process governing administrative and judicial complaints. These principles arise from the holy covenant shared by members of the Church and are intended to protect both individuals and the Church itself. Fair process is not simply a collection of technical requirements, but an essential expression of justice, accountability, and the Church’s responsibility to exercise authority faithfully. The provisions apply throughout the complaint process and require particular attention to the timely resolution of matters and the rights of all participants.

Among the protections established by Paragraph 905 are the right of the complainant and respondent to be heard before final action, written notice of hearings at least twenty days in advance, and the right to be present and accompanied by a support person who is a member of the Global Methodist Church and has the right to speak. The respondent must have access, at least ten days before a hearing, to the records upon which the outcome may be based, including the written complaint. The Discipline also prohibits improper ex parte communications concerning substantive matters with members of a hearing body. Questions of procedure may be addressed to the presiding officer, with the answers shared with all parties.

Additional provisions address failure to respond to supervisory requests, the Church’s responsibility to provide resources for healing following significant disruption, protections against double jeopardy, and the responsibilities of participants in church proceedings. AIA emphasizes that fair process must be faithfully observed at every stage, including supervisory responses, investigations, administrative reviews, hearings, and appeals. Individuals must have meaningful opportunities to understand allegations, respond to concerns, and exercise the protections established by church law. The Church’s commitment to reconciliation and restoration can never replace its obligation to act justly. Respect for fair process strengthens the integrity of the Church and demonstrates its covenantal responsibility to all who participate in its life and ministry.

Judicial Processes and Fair Process

The Global Methodist Church establishes a judicial process to address allegations of misconduct involving clergy, bishops, and professing members of local churches. Paragraph 908 of the Book of Doctrines and Discipline identifies chargeable offenses and provides the foundation for judicial complaints. These proceedings are distinct from administrative complaints concerning ministerial effectiveness or the performance of pastoral duties. Judicial proceedings must follow established church law and protect the rights of all participants.

The judicial process includes a supervisory response, investigation of allegations, and, when warranted, referral for trial. Paragraph 909 establishes the judicial supervisory response, while Paragraphs 910–912 address the composition and responsibilities of Committees on Investigation and the referral of complaints for further judicial action. The purpose of these procedures is to establish facts, evaluate allegations, provide opportunities for appropriate resolution, and determine whether sufficient grounds exist for a church trial. The judicial process is governed by the Book of Doctrines and Discipline and the applicable Judicial Practices and Procedures.

Associates in Advocacy recognizes that judicial proceedings can have profound consequences for individuals, congregations, and the wider Church. We seek to assist complainants, respondents, advocates, and church leaders in understanding their rights and responsibilities, the authority of judicial bodies, and the procedural safeguards established by church law. Particular attention is given to the Principles of Fair Process under Paragraph 905, the independence of investigative and judicial bodies, and the proper application of disciplinary provisions. Our commitment is to accountability, the pursuit of truth, reconciliation and restoration wherever possible, and justice always.

Chargeable Offenses — Paragraph 908

Paragraph 908 of the Global Methodist Church’s Book of Doctrines and Discipline establishes the provisions governing judicial complaints and identifies the offenses for which clergy, bishops, and professing members may be subject to church judicial proceedings. Under Paragraph 908.1, chargeable offenses for clergy and bishops include conviction or admission of guilt in criminal activities, fiscal malfeasance or gross financial mismanagement, discrimination or harassment, disobedience to the order and discipline of the Church, conduct contrary to established doctrines and practices, behavior that undermines another pastor’s ministry, and specified forms of sexual misconduct. Paragraph 908.2 separately identifies the offenses applicable to professing members of local churches.

AIA emphasizes the fundamental distinction between administrative complaints concerning ministerial performance and judicial complaints alleging chargeable misconduct. Paragraph 906 addresses incompetence, ineffectiveness, unwillingness, or inability to perform ministerial duties, while Paragraph 908 addresses specific offenses that may result in judicial proceedings. The nature of a complaint must be determined by examining the actual allegations rather than relying solely upon the terminology used by the complainant or the official receiving the complaint. Not every disagreement, leadership conflict, or allegation of unsatisfactory performance constitutes a chargeable offense. Proper classification is essential to determining the appropriate process, the authority of church bodies, and the procedural protections afforded to the parties.

Paragraph 908 also establishes important limitations governing judicial complaints. Under the 2024 Discipline, the general statute of limitations is six years, with exceptions for allegations involving sexual or child abuse and crimes involving such abuse. The Discipline also addresses the effect of time spent on leave of absence and requires attention to the disciplinary provisions applicable when the alleged offense occurred, subject to specified exceptions. AIA encourages advocates to examine each allegation carefully, identify the applicable church law, determine whether the complaint satisfies the disciplinary requirements, and ensure that the rights of complainants and respondents are protected. Judicial proceedings must be grounded in specific allegations, supported by appropriate evidence, and conducted according to the established principles of fair process.

Judicial Supervisory Response — Paragraph 909

Paragraph 909 of the Global Methodist Church’s Book of Doctrines and Discipline establishes the judicial supervisory response for complaints alleging chargeable misconduct. The purpose of this response is to establish the relevant facts, consider the circumstances and explanations offered by the parties, determine whether the allegations warrant further action, and seek a resolution that restores compliance with church law and addresses any harm resulting from a violation. Under the Judicial Practices and Procedures (JPP 4), the initial supervisory response ordinarily includes a required in-person meeting involving the complainant, respondent, and conference superintendent or designated representative. When the respondent is a bishop, the supervisory process is administered by the chair of the Global Episcopacy Committee or a designee.

The Judicial Practices and Procedures establish important protections during the supervisory response. Both the complainant and respondent are entitled to have a support person present who has the right to speak during the meeting. Participants must receive at least twenty days’ notice of the meeting. The supervisory response must be completed within sixty days after receipt of the complaint by the person administering the process, with one possible thirty-day extension if both the complainant and respondent agree. These requirements provide opportunities for meaningful participation, careful examination of the allegations, and a timely determination of the appropriate next steps.

The judicial supervisory response may result in three outcomes. First, the complaint may be dismissed when it has no basis in church law or fact, subject to the required agreement of the appropriate supervising body and a written explanation. Second, the parties may reach an agreed resolution, which must be documented, signed, and placed in the respondent’s personnel file, with responsibility assigned for ensuring compliance. Third, when no resolution is reached and the allegations have a factual basis warranting further action, the matter may be referred to counsel for the Church for presentation to a Committee on Investigation. Paragraph 909 also permits temporary suspension from ministerial responsibilities under specified circumstances and safeguards. AIA emphasizes that supervisory proceedings must be conducted without prejudging guilt, while protecting the rights of all participants and seeking accountability, reconciliation, restoration, and justice.

Committees on Investigation — Paragraphs 910–912

Paragraphs 910–912 of the Global Methodist Church’s Book of Doctrines and Discipline establish the composition, responsibilities, and procedures of Committees on Investigation. These committees have the important responsibility of examining allegations of chargeable misconduct and determining whether reasonable grounds exist to bring charges to trial. Under Paragraph 910, the composition of a committee depends upon whether the respondent is a bishop, clergy member, or professing lay member. For clergy complaints, each annual conference elects a Committee on Investigation consisting of four ordained clergy and three lay members, together with alternates, according to Paragraph 710.6. The independence of committee members and the avoidance of conflicts of interest are essential to maintaining confidence in the judicial process.

When a judicial complaint is referred for investigation, Paragraph 911 establishes the responsibilities for appointing counsel for the Church. Counsel presents the allegations through the investigative process, while the Committee on Investigation independently examines the complaint and the evidence supporting it. Paragraph 912 makes an essential distinction: the committee’s responsibility is to determine whether reasonable grounds exist to support a bill of charges and specifications, not to determine guilt or innocence. Reasonable grounds require sufficient reason, based upon known facts, to believe that a chargeable offense has been committed. When such grounds are established, the committee prepares, signs, and certifies the charges and specifications for trial. The investigation must follow the applicable Judicial Practices and Procedures, including JPP 7.

Associates in Advocacy emphasizes that Committees on Investigation serve as essential safeguards within the judicial system. Their members must examine allegations impartially, distinguish evidence from assumptions, respect the procedural rights of respondents and complainants, and exercise their independent judgment. The committee must not function merely as an extension of the supervising bishop, conference superintendent, or counsel for the Church. Its responsibility is to determine whether the evidence and applicable church law justify further proceedings. Faithful observance of these responsibilities protects individuals from unsupported charges, preserves the integrity of the judicial process, and demonstrates the Church’s commitment to accountability, reconciliation, restoration, and justice.

Church Trials and Fair Process — Paragraphs 913–915

Paragraph 913 of the Global Methodist Church’s Book of Doctrines and Discipline establishes that church trials are to be regarded as a last resort, undertaken only after reasonable efforts have been made to correct wrongdoing and resolve existing difficulties. When a judicial complaint proceeds to trial, the proceedings must be conducted by a properly constituted trial court following due investigation and according to the requirements of church law. Paragraph 914 establishes different responsibilities for convening trials involving bishops, clergy members, and professing lay members. These proceedings are governed by the Book of Doctrines and Discipline and the applicable Judicial Practices and Procedures, particularly JPP 8–13.

The trial court has responsibility for hearing evidence, determining whether the charges and specifications have been established, and reaching a verdict. Under Paragraph 915, a conviction ordinarily requires at least nine votes of the trial court. If the number of trial court members falls below thirteen, a two-thirds vote is required. The Church must establish each charge and specification by clear and convincing evidence, demonstrating that the alleged conduct is highly and substantially more likely to be true than untrue. The trial court must make findings on each charge and its individual specifications. These requirements, together with the Principles of Fair Process established by Paragraph 905, are essential safeguards against unsupported convictions and improper proceedings.

When a respondent is convicted, the trial court must separately determine an appropriate penalty. Paragraph 915 provides that penalties may include suspension from ministerial responsibilities, termination of conference membership, revocation of ministerial credentials, removal from professing membership, or lesser disciplinary measures, as applicable to the respondent. A penalty ordinarily requires at least seven votes, or a majority if the trial court has fewer than thirteen members. Trial court findings remain subject to the applicable appellate procedures. AIA emphasizes that the integrity of church trials depends upon impartiality, careful evaluation of evidence, respect for procedural rights, and faithful application of church law. Justice requires both a fair process and a decision grounded in the evidence and the authority granted by the Discipline.

Appeals and Judicial Review — Paragraphs 916–918

Paragraph 916 of the Global Methodist Church’s Book of Doctrines and Discipline establishes the general procedures governing appeals from church trials and certain appellate decisions. Under the 2024 Discipline, an appellant must provide written notice of appeal within thirty days of the trial court’s verdict and announcement of penalty, or the issuance of a written decision by an appellate body other than the Connectional Council on Appeals. The notice must identify the grounds upon which the appeal is based. Appellate review is generally confined to the official record of the proceedings and considers whether the charges were supported by clear and convincing evidence and whether errors of church law affected the verdict or penalty. Appellate bodies do not conduct a new trial or receive additional witness testimony.

The Discipline distinguishes between appeals from judicial proceedings and appeals involving questions of church law. Paragraph 917 establishes procedures for reviewing questions of law arising in charge, district, annual, and General Conference proceedings. Such questions may ultimately be reviewed by the Connectional Council on Appeals according to the applicable provisions. Paragraph 916 also establishes limitations on the Church’s right to appeal judicial findings. Although the Church may not appeal the trial court’s findings of fact, it may seek review of egregious errors of church law or administration that could reasonably have affected the findings. This distinction protects the independence of the trial court while providing a means of correcting significant legal or procedural errors.

Paragraph 918 separately establishes procedures for appeals involving administrative decisions. These appeals ordinarily proceed through the Administrative Review Committee, the full Board of Ministry, and the clergy session of the annual conference. Questions of church law arising from an administrative process may be presented to the bishop in the clergy session and reviewed by the Connectional Council on Appeals. Administrative appeals focus on errors of church law or procedure that may have affected the action taken, rather than providing an opportunity to conduct an entirely new evidentiary hearing. AIA emphasizes that advocates must carefully identify the appropriate appellate body, preserve relevant objections, observe filing deadlines, and distinguish disputed facts from questions of church law. Faithful appellate review protects individual rights, strengthens accountability, and helps ensure that justice is served throughout the Church.

Connectional Council on Appeals

The Connectional Council on Appeals is the highest judicial body of the Global Methodist Church. Established under Article IX of the Constitution (Paragraph 210) and further defined by Paragraphs 920–925 of the Book of Doctrines and Discipline, the Council is responsible for interpreting church law, reviewing certain decisions and actions of church bodies, and determining questions concerning the constitutionality and application of the Discipline. Under the 2024 provisions, the Council consists of seven elected members representing both clergy and laity. Its independence is essential to maintaining accountability and ensuring that the Church exercises its authority in accordance with its governing documents.

The Council’s jurisdiction includes reviewing decisions of law made by bishops, determining the legality of certain actions taken by General Conference and annual conferences, and considering petitions seeking interpretation of the Book of Doctrines and Discipline. Under Paragraph 922, the Council may also exercise discretionary review through petitions for certiorari, including certain appeals from annual conference committees on appeals. The ability to bring a matter before the Council depends upon the particular jurisdictional requirements established by church law. Not every disagreement or administrative decision is subject to direct review, and advocates must carefully determine whether the proper grounds and procedures for an appeal or petition have been established.

The Council operates under its own Rules of Practice and Procedure, consistent with the Book of Doctrines and Discipline. Paragraph 924 provides that its decisions are final and are to be published electronically for public review. Paragraph 925 also addresses the precedential value of decisions from predecessor Methodist judicial bodies, including the Judicial Council of The United Methodist Church. Such decisions may be cited before the Council but have precedential authority only to the extent determined by the Council itself. Associates in Advocacy seeks to help clergy, laity, advocates, and church leaders understand the Council’s jurisdiction, research its decisions, and prepare informed submissions concerning questions of church law. Through education and responsible advocacy, AIA seeks to promote constitutional accountability, faithful interpretation of the Discipline, fair process, and justice throughout the Church.

Advocacy Guides and Educational Resources

Associates in Advocacy is committed to equipping individuals with the knowledge, skills, and practical resources necessary to participate effectively in the administrative and judicial processes of the Global Methodist Church. Effective advocacy requires familiarity with the Book of Doctrines and Discipline, the Judicial Practices and Procedures, and the responsibilities of the various church bodies involved in complaints, investigations, hearings, and appeals. It also requires careful preparation, responsible documentation, an understanding of procedural rights, and a commitment to fairness and integrity.

This resource center will provide educational materials and practical guides for advocates, clergy, complainants, respondents, presiding elders, conference superintendents, bishops, and church leaders. Topics will include preparing for supervisory meetings, distinguishing administrative complaints from judicial complaints, organizing case documents, preparing for investigations and hearings, identifying applicable disciplinary provisions, and researching decisions of the Connectional Council on Appeals. Particular attention will be given to the responsibilities of advocates and support persons, the independence of investigative and review bodies, and the protections established by the Principles of Fair Process under Paragraph 905.

AIA recognizes that individuals involved in church administrative or judicial proceedings may face unfamiliar procedures, significant personal and professional consequences, and difficult questions concerning their relationships with the Church. Our educational resources are intended to encourage informed participation, thoughtful preparation, and appropriate assistance throughout the process. Through training, guidance, and the sharing of experience, AIA seeks to strengthen responsible advocacy while promoting accountability, reconciliation and restoration wherever possible, and justice always.

Getting Started as an Advocate

Serving as an advocate or support person within the Global Methodist Church is both a significant responsibility and an opportunity for Christian service. Advocates help individuals understand church procedures, prepare for supervisory meetings and hearings, organize relevant information, and participate meaningfully in processes that may have profound consequences for their ministries and lives. Effective advocacy begins with careful listening, understanding the circumstances, identifying the applicable provisions of the Book of Doctrines and Discipline and Judicial Practices and Procedures, and establishing a relationship of trust. Advocates must understand their authorized role, respect the rights of everyone involved, and maintain the integrity of the Church’s administrative and judicial processes. The goal of advocacy is not simply to achieve a desired outcome but to ensure that church law is faithfully followed and that justice is pursued throughout the process.

• Listen carefully to the individual’s concerns and establish the nature of the matter.
• Identify the applicable provisions of the Book of Doctrines and Discipline and Judicial Practices and Procedures, including any amendments governing the matter.
• Determine whether the matter involves an administrative complaint under Paragraph 906, a judicial complaint under Paragraph 908, or another form of church supervision.
• Gather and organize relevant correspondence, documents, and a chronology of events.
• Clarify the advocate’s authorized role, rights of accompaniment and representation, confidentiality requirements, procedural deadlines, and the next required action.

Preparing for Supervisory Meetings

Supervisory meetings are an important part of the Global Methodist Church’s procedures for addressing concerns involving clergy and their ministries. The Book of Doctrines and Discipline distinguishes between administrative complaints concerning unsatisfactory ministerial performance under Paragraph 906 and judicial complaints involving alleged misconduct under Paragraphs 908–909. Although both processes include a supervisory response, their purposes, procedures, and possible outcomes must be understood separately. Effective preparation begins with identifying the nature of the complaint, reviewing the applicable disciplinary provisions, and understanding the responsibilities of the individuals participating in the meeting.

Before attending a supervisory meeting, an advocate or support person should carefully review the written complaint, relevant correspondence, and available documentation. Preparation should include developing a chronology of events, identifying questions requiring clarification, and discussing possible outcomes with the individual being represented. The Judicial Practices and Procedures establish requirements concerning advance notice, participation, and the opportunity for complainants and respondents to be accompanied by support persons who may speak during supervisory meetings. Advocates should verify the applicable provisions, confirm procedural deadlines, and ensure that the person being represented understands the purpose and possible consequences of the meeting.

During the meeting, advocates should encourage respectful communication, careful examination of the allegations, and a meaningful opportunity for all participants to be heard. Particular attention should be given to distinguishing established facts from disputed allegations, identifying the applicable provisions of church law, and clarifying proposed resolutions or future actions. Following the meeting, the advocate and the individual being represented should review the discussions, document any agreements or unresolved questions, and confirm the next procedural steps and deadlines. AIA encourages advocates to approach supervisory meetings with integrity, preparation, and a commitment to accountability, reconciliation and restoration wherever possible, and justice always.

GMC Supervisory Meeting Preparation Checklist

The following checklist provides practical guidance for advocates and support persons preparing for supervisory meetings under the Global Methodist Church’s administrative and judicial complaint procedures.

Before the Meeting

1. Identify whether the matter concerns an administrative complaint under ¶906 or a judicial complaint under ¶¶908–909.
2. Obtain and review the written complaint and identify the specific allegations being made.
3. Verify that the required advance notice has been provided. Under the published 2024 JPP, participants must receive at least twenty days’ notice of the supervisory meeting.
4. Review the applicable provisions of the Book of Doctrines and Discipline and Judicial Practices and Procedures.
5. Prepare a chronology of relevant events, correspondence, meetings, and decisions.
6. Gather supporting documents and identify individuals who may possess relevant firsthand information.
7. Confirm the support person’s authorized role, including the right to speak during the meeting.
8. Discuss the principal concerns, questions, possible resolutions, and desired outcomes with the person being represented.

During the Meeting

1. Listen carefully to the allegations and explanations offered by the participants.
2. Distinguish established facts from disputed allegations, opinions, and assumptions.
3. Ask for clarification regarding the specific provisions of church law involved.
4. Ensure that the person being represented has a meaningful opportunity to respond.
5. Exercise the support person’s right to speak respectfully and appropriately.
6. Seek clarification concerning any proposed resolution, including its terms and implementation.
7. Document important discussions and decisions, subject to applicable confidentiality requirements.
8. Confirm the next steps, including any outstanding questions, necessary documents, or deadlines.

After the Meeting

1. Review the meeting with the person being represented and identify any unresolved concerns.
2. Prepare an accurate written summary of the meeting for the case file.
3. Confirm whether the complaint was dismissed, an agreed resolution was reached, or the matter will proceed to further investigation.
4. Review any proposed written resolution before it is signed.
5. Identify who is responsible for implementing any agreement and how compliance will be monitored.
6. Confirm applicable procedural deadlines. Under the published 2024 JPP, the supervisory response ordinarily must be completed within sixty days of receipt of the complaint, subject to one thirty-day extension agreed upon by both parties.
7. Preserve relevant correspondence, notices, documents, and meeting records securely.
8. Determine the next appropriate action while continuing to seek accountability, reconciliation, restoration, and justice.

Final Review

Before proceeding to another stage, the advocate should verify that the requirements of the applicable Discipline and Judicial Practices and Procedures have been observed. Particular attention should be given to the distinction between administrative and judicial complaints, the rights of the parties, and the authority of the officials responsible for the process.

Understanding Administrative and Judicial Complaints

Understanding the nature of a complaint is one of the first responsibilities of an effective advocate within the Global Methodist Church. Paragraph 903 of the Book of Doctrines and Discipline establishes that formal complaints must be written and signed, alleging either unsatisfactory ministerial performance or chargeable misconduct. Administrative complaints involving clergy are governed by Paragraph 906, while administrative complaints concerning bishops are addressed by Paragraph 907. Judicial complaints alleging chargeable offenses are governed by Paragraph 908. These distinctions determine the procedures to be followed, the church officials and committees responsible for handling the matter, and the procedural protections available to the participants.

Administrative complaints concern allegations of incompetence, ineffectiveness, unwillingness, or inability to perform ministerial duties. Judicial complaints, by contrast, involve allegations of specific chargeable offenses identified in the Discipline. Not every disagreement concerning pastoral leadership, conflict within a congregation, or allegation of unsatisfactory performance constitutes chargeable misconduct. Likewise, allegations of professional or personal misconduct must not be handled merely as administrative performance concerns. AIA emphasizes that the substance of the allegations, rather than the terminology used to describe them, should determine the appropriate process.

An advocate should begin by carefully reviewing the written complaint, identifying the specific conduct alleged, and determining which disciplinary provisions apply. Important considerations include the dates of the alleged events, supporting documentation, the authority of the officials receiving and processing the complaint, and the procedural rights and deadlines established by the Discipline and Judicial Practices and Procedures. Particular attention should be given to the rights of complainants and respondents under Paragraph 905 and the opportunities for just resolution provided by Paragraph 904. Proper identification of the complaint process is essential to ensuring accountability, protecting individual rights, and pursuing reconciliation, restoration, and justice.

Initial Complaint Assessment Checklist

Before proceeding with representation or offering guidance, an advocate should conduct an initial assessment of the complaint and the disciplinary procedures that may apply. The following questions provide a framework for evaluating administrative and judicial complaints within the Global Methodist Church.

Initial Complaint Assessment

1. Identify the parties. Who is the complainant? Who is the respondent? Is the respondent a clergy member, bishop, or professing lay member? What church or conference relationships are involved?
2. Determine the nature of the complaint. Does the matter involve unsatisfactory ministerial performance under Paragraph 906, an administrative complaint against a bishop under Paragraph 907, alleged chargeable misconduct under Paragraph 908, or another concern?
3. Examine the allegations. What specific conduct or performance concerns are alleged? Does the complaint provide relevant dates, circumstances, supporting facts, or other information?
4. Verify the complaint requirements. Is the complaint written and signed as required by Paragraph 903? Was it submitted to the appropriate church officials, and have the required notifications been provided?
5. Identify applicable church law. Which edition and provisions of the Book of Doctrines and Discipline and Judicial Practices and Procedures govern the complaint? Have any subsequent General Conference actions or procedural amendments affected those provisions?
6. Determine the appropriate process. Should the matter proceed through an administrative supervisory response, judicial supervisory response, investigation, or another authorized church procedure?
7. Identify the responsible authority. Which bishop, conference superintendent, presiding elder, committee, or other church body has jurisdiction and responsibility for the next action?
8. Review fair process protections. What rights of notice, response, accompaniment, access to records, and confidentiality apply under Paragraph 905 and the relevant Judicial Practices and Procedures?
9. Establish the timeline and preserve the record. When did the alleged conduct occur? When was the complaint received? What deadlines, statutes of limitations, or authorized extensions apply? What documents and correspondence must be preserved securely?
10. Determine the next appropriate step. What response is required, what additional information is needed, and what opportunities exist for a just resolution under Paragraph 904? What action best protects the rights of everyone involved while maintaining accountability and fairness?

Final Assessment

The advocate should review the initial findings with the person being represented and identify any unresolved questions concerning jurisdiction, applicable procedures, or disciplinary requirements. The assessment should be updated as additional information becomes available or the matter moves to another stage of the process.

Careful initial assessment is essential to ensuring that complaints are handled through the appropriate procedures, that church officials act within their authorized responsibilities, and that reconciliation, restoration, and justice remain central to the process.

Preparing Documents and Evidence

Effective advocacy within the Global Methodist Church requires careful preparation, accurate documentation, and responsible management of evidence. Whether a matter involves an administrative complaint under Paragraph 906, a judicial complaint under Paragraph 908, or an appeal, a well-organized record is essential to understanding the circumstances and presenting information fairly. Advocates should work with the individuals they represent to identify relevant documents, preserve original materials, and distinguish established facts from disputed allegations, opinions, and assumptions. Particular attention should be given to the dates, sources, and context of documents and the requirements of the applicable Book of Doctrines and Discipline and Judicial Practices and Procedures.

A useful starting point is the preparation of a detailed chronology identifying significant events, conversations, correspondence, meetings, decisions, and actions. Supporting documentation may include written complaints, emails, text messages, meeting minutes, clergy evaluations, personnel records lawfully available to the parties, official notices, and committee decisions. Advocates should preserve documents in their original form whenever possible, identify the source of each item, and maintain accurate copies. Potential witnesses should be identified according to their firsthand knowledge of relevant events. Careful preparation also requires examining evidence that may contradict an allegation or support a different understanding of the circumstances. The purpose is not merely to assemble favorable information but to establish an accurate and complete record.

Confidentiality and proper handling of evidence are essential responsibilities in administrative and judicial proceedings. Paragraph 905 establishes Principles of Fair Process that must be considered alongside the specific requirements of the applicable Judicial Practices and Procedures. Advocates should understand which records may be accessed, what information may be disclosed, and what restrictions govern the use of confidential materials. Sensitive documents should be stored securely and shared only with authorized individuals. Evidence should never be altered, selectively misrepresented, or obtained through improper means. Associates in Advocacy encourages advocates to approach the preparation of documents and evidence with integrity, accuracy, respect for all participants, and a commitment to ensuring that the Church’s pursuit of accountability is grounded in truth, fairness, reconciliation, restoration, and justice.

Document and Evidence Preparation Checklist

Careful organization of documents and evidence helps advocates establish an accurate record, identify important questions, and prepare effectively for administrative and judicial proceedings. The following checklist provides a practical framework for assembling and maintaining case materials within the Global Methodist Church.

Document and Evidence Preparation Checklist

1. Establish a secure case file. Create an organized system for maintaining complaints, correspondence, meeting notes, official documents, and other relevant information.
2. Develop a chronology of events. Prepare a timeline identifying significant events, communications, meetings, decisions, and actions, including dates and individuals involved.
3. Gather official documents. Obtain authorized copies of written complaints, supervisory notices, committee decisions, evaluations, personnel records, and other relevant church documents.
4. Preserve electronic correspondence. Maintain emails, text messages, electronic attachments, and other communications in their original form whenever possible, preserving dates, senders, recipients, and relevant metadata.
5. Identify applicable church law. Collect relevant provisions of the Book of Doctrines and Discipline, Judicial Practices and Procedures, and decisions of the Connectional Council on Appeals. Note the applicable editions and effective dates.
6. Identify potential witnesses. Prepare a list of individuals who may possess firsthand knowledge of relevant circumstances. Describe the information each may provide without assuming that their statements are accurate.
7. Distinguish facts from allegations. Separate documented facts, firsthand observations, disputed statements, opinions, and assumptions. Identify evidence that may support or contradict the allegations.
8. Organize supporting materials. Assign document numbers or descriptive filenames to relevant materials so they can be located and referenced accurately during supervisory meetings, investigations, hearings, and appeals.
9. Protect confidential information. Store sensitive records securely, restrict access to authorized individuals, and observe applicable confidentiality requirements. Do not publish or distribute confidential case materials without proper authorization.
10. Review the complete record. Identify missing documents, inconsistencies, unresolved questions, potential procedural concerns, and additional information that may be needed.

Final Review

Before a meeting or hearing, the advocate should review the organized record with the individual being represented, verify the chronology, identify the principal issues, and determine which documents may properly be presented.

The preparation of evidence must always be guided by accuracy, integrity, confidentiality, and respect for the procedural rights of everyone involved. Advocates should preserve original materials, avoid improperly influencing witnesses, and ensure that documents are obtained and used through authorized procedures.

Researching GMC Church Law and Decisions of the Connectional Council on Appeals

Effective advocacy within the Global Methodist Church requires careful research into the Book of Doctrines and Discipline, the Judicial Practices and Procedures, legislation adopted by General Conference, and decisions of the Connectional Council on Appeals. Church law must be interpreted within its proper context, recognizing that disciplinary provisions may be amended and that judicial decisions may clarify their meaning, application, or constitutionality. Advocates should begin by identifying the specific questions presented by a case, locating the relevant disciplinary provisions, and determining which edition of the Discipline and procedural rules govern the matter.

The Connectional Council on Appeals serves as the highest judicial body of the Global Methodist Church and provides authoritative decisions concerning the interpretation and application of church law within its jurisdiction. Advocates should examine relevant Council decisions, identifying the questions presented, the findings and holdings of the Council, the reasoning supporting its conclusions, and the limits of its rulings. Particular attention should be given to the Council’s jurisdiction, the requirements for submitting petitions or appeals, and the precedential authority of earlier decisions. Paragraph 925 addresses the treatment of decisions from predecessor Methodist judicial bodies. Advocates must distinguish between binding authority, persuasive precedent, and interpretations advanced by individual parties.

AIA encourages advocates to organize their research systematically, maintaining accurate references to disciplinary paragraphs, Judicial Practices and Procedures, Council decisions, and subsequent legislative amendments. Written arguments should clearly distinguish established church law from disputed interpretations and identify how the relevant provisions apply to the particular circumstances. Advocates should also consider decisions that may challenge their positions rather than selecting only favorable authorities. Responsible research strengthens the credibility of advocacy, protects individual rights, and supports the faithful administration of church law. Through careful preparation and principled argument, AIA seeks to advance accountability, reconciliation, restoration, and justice throughout the Church.

Document Library and Archives

Associates in Advocacy is developing a collection of educational materials, procedural guides, church-law references, and historical resources to support individuals involved in the administrative and judicial processes of the Global Methodist Church. The Document Library and Archives will provide an organized location where advocates, clergy, laity, conference leaders, and church officers can locate information relevant to their responsibilities and circumstances. These resources are intended to encourage informed participation, responsible advocacy, and faithful application of the Church’s governing documents.

The collection will include materials addressing the Book of Doctrines and Discipline, Judicial Practices and Procedures, administrative and judicial complaints, fair process protections, and decisions of the Connectional Council on Appeals. Practical resources will include supervisory meeting preparation checklists, initial complaint assessment guides, document and evidence preparation materials, and educational resources explaining church law. Particular attention will be given to preserving materials from the 2024 Convening General Conference and identifying significant developments resulting from the 2026 General Conference. As additional resources become available, they will be organized by subject to make them easier to locate, review, and download.

AIA is committed to preserving educational and historical materials while respecting confidentiality, privacy, and the procedural rights of individuals involved in church proceedings. Documents made available through the library will be selected for their educational or historical value and reviewed for appropriate public distribution. Confidential case files, personal information, and materials protected by church law will not be made publicly available without proper authorization. Through this collection, AIA seeks to strengthen informed advocacy, preserve institutional knowledge, and support the Global Methodist Church’s continuing commitment to accountability, reconciliation, restoration, and justice.